Journal of Fluid Mechanics (2014)

Seriously Flawed, including Inconsistent Results and Non-Reproducible Figures

The following JFM publication by Avsarkisov, Oberlack & Hoyas (2014) is flawed and non-reproducible:
New scaling laws for turbulent Poiseuille flow with wall transpiration
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.98

Details and corrections are given in https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08396

Note that JFM has the obscure policy not to publish any Comments on any of their articles.

Popular posts from this blog

Springer Proceedings in Physics (2019)

Methodologically Flawed & Seriously Misleading The following publication by Klingenberg, Oberlack & Pluemacher (2019) is methodologically flawed and seriously misleading: Symmetry-Based Turbulence Modeling https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22196-6_5 Details are given in the review  https://publons.com/publon/27659704/#review-5598480
Read more

Group analysis, direct numerical simulation and modelling of a turbulent channel flow with streamwise rotation

Published in JFM, 2006 by Oberlack, Cabot, Pettersson-Reif & Weller. This publication is misleading and flawed. Apart from various mathematical errors, this study is altogether inconsistent in its Lie-group symmetry part. In addition it also contains several non-reproducible conclusions. All details and corrections to this flawed study are given in https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08155 .
Read more

On the Lie symmetries of characteristic function hierarchy in compressible turbulence

Published in European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2022  by Praturi, Plümacher & Oberlack. All problems that one encounters in the incompressible case translate here one-to-one to the compressible case: A symmetry analysis of an unclosed system with an infinite hierarchy is performed again, leading to two nonphysical "symmetries" (4.17) and (4.18), where the latter one is incorrectly elevated again to a symmetry that should reflect external intermittency in turbulent flows. But, exactly as in the incompressible case, these two "symmetries" are just mathematical artefacts of the unclosed equations and not reflected by experiment or numerical simulation. They both fail to model turbulence or to derive turbulent scaling laws that can be matched to relevant data. The scaling failure in the incompressible case is explicitly shown in https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.985 ,  https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3061 ,  https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08396 ,  https://doi....
Read more